Floresta e Ambiente
Floresta e Ambiente

Guidelines and Policies


Only those articles that fit into the following Forestry Science thematic areas are accepted for publication in Floresta e Ambiente: Forestry, Forest Management, Forest Products Science and Technology, Forest Biomass and Energy and Conservation of Nature.

Floresta e Ambiente maintains high ethical standards on publications and strict criteria for published articles. The journal selects independent and ethical reviewers who are qualified and able to conduct an impartial review, always seeking constructive and professional criticism.


The submission of an article in FLORAM implies that it has not been previously published; is not under evaluation for publication in any other journal; its publication was approved by all the authors and institution where it was made. The publisher will not be legally responsible for the content of the same.

Authors of articles derived from academic theses should, at the time of submission, attach a letter to the Editor providing this information (See item "Upload and File Designation"). Failure to comply with this requirement could lead to the detection of plagiarism in the manuscript and, consequently, its rejection.


After submission, the inclusion or removal of authors is prohibited. If necessary, the evaluation of the article will be canceled and a new submission will be required.

After submission, a change of authors' order will only be accepted if: 1) the corresponding author sends an e-mail to floramjournal@gmail.com, with a copy to all other authors, requesting the alteration; 2) all other authors send an email to floramjournal@gmail.com informing that they are aware and in accordance with the requested change; and 3) all emails sent must use the address submitted at the time of submission.

Peer Review

FLORAM works in a double-blind review process. All submitted articles are initially evaluated by the Chief Editor and / or Associate Editors regarding merit and scientific contribution. Then the manuscripts are sent to specialized reviewers. The Associate Editor makes a recommendation on the article and sends it to the Editor-in-Chief, who makes the final decision based on the recommendations made.

In order to preserve the double-blind system, the documents and information presented by the authors at the time of submission should not contain information that allows their identification, such as names, signatures or information that the article is the product of a dissertation or thesis. Information about the institution where the research was conducted, year and the form of linkage of the author with the institution should also be avoided. If authors are required to use this information to provide clarification to the Editors, they should do so at the time of submission in a document designated as "File NOT for review" (See "Upload and File Designation").

At the time of submission, it is mandatory to indicate at least three potential reviewers for the article. The reviewers listed may be invited to review the article at Editor's discretion. Professionals close to one of the authors or members of the same institution or who in any way may have some conflict of interest about the work should not be indicated. Authors should prioritize the appointment of highly qualified professionals and experts in the manuscript area.

Conflict of Interest and Copyright

If there is any conflict of interest, authors should indicate which one or which, during the submission process. At the same time, the authors must transfer the copyrights of the work to the FLORAM.

Researches Involving Human Beings

All research involving human beings, individually or collectively, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, including the handling of biological data, information or materials, shall comply with all applicable regulatory guidelines and standards required by the country of research. The research should inform that there was consent of the participant, that is, the participants were clarified about the nature of the research, its objectives, methods, expected benefits, potential risks and the annoyance that this might entail to them, as far as they are understood and respected in their singularities. If applicable, it is recommended that the Ethics Committee of the responsible educational institution be consulted.


Types of Manuscripts

Research Articles:  they are works whose results were derived from concrete information of data obtained experimentally or collected in the literature, or from other reliable source. Structured in: Introduction and objectives; Materials and methods; Results and discussion (may be in separated items); Conclusions; and References. The manuscript must contain a maximum of 4000 words, excluding the figures and tables and their titles, and the item Bibliographical References. Figures and Tables should be inserted into the body of the manuscript and are limited to 10 (ten) in the set.

Review article:  Review article submissions will only be accepted upon invitation from the Editorial Board. These are considered articles of special content whose relevance fits the need for a complete literary basis of a certain theme. The manuscript must contain a maximum of 6000 words, excluding figures and tables and their titles, and the item Bibliographical References. Figures and Tables should be inserted into the body of the manuscript and are limited to 10 (ten) in the set.

Scientific Communication: they are articles that describe an event of innovative character and of great importance for Forestry Sciences. It should be written in a clear way, focusing directly on the original results and/or proposals. It is hoped that the scientific communication will contain important contributions to the scientific community. The communications don't follow the classic divisions of a traditional papers, having to flow in a single text, putting in notes technical details and other relevant comments. The manuscript must contain a maximum of 1200 words, excluding the figures and tables and their titles, and the item Bibliographical References. Figures and Tables must be inserted into the body of the manuscript and are limited to 5 (five) in the set.


The manuscript should be written in English, with great care about its objectivity, clarity and conciseness. Authors are responsible for ensuring that the article has been reviewed or translated by native English speakers or professionals with solid knowledge of the language. This must be confirmed by means of a declaratory document, which must be attached at the time of submission (see "Upload and File Designation"). The document should contain the title of the manuscript and the name and signature of the reviewer / translator.

The author who possesses solid knowledge in English may write the manuscript, although this practice is not recommended. In this case, the author should sign the declaration. In case of language problems being detected during the evaluation of the article, a language review fee may be charged to the authors after the article has been accepted.

Formatting Requirements

Manuscripts must be edited in Microsoft Office Word with Times New Roman font size 12 and double spacing. The maximum number of words, figures and tables, as well as the structure of the text, must be in agreement with each type of manuscript, according to the item “Types of Manuscript”.

Authors' names, affiliation, e-mail address, acknowledgments or source of funding in the article should not be included in the manuscript. The file name should not contain the names of the authors. All such information will be collected during submission.

Front page: the first page, before the body of the manuscript, must contain, in this order: Title, Summary and Keywords.

 Title:  It must contain a maximum of 16 words. .

Abstract: It should contain at least 40 and a maximum of 150 words .

Keywords: Must contain three to five keywords. Do not use words that are already present in the Title of the article.

Figures, Tables, Equations and Units of Measurements

Figures: Must be presented with resolution above 300dpi. The title should be positioned just below the picture. This includes graphics, photos (clear and with contrast), drawing, etc. All the pictures should be quoted in the text.

Tables: They must be sent in editable format. The title should be positioned above the figure. All the tables should be quoted on the text.

Equations: should be numbered and cited in the text. The equations must be in editable format. Equations in the form of figures will not be accepted.

Units of measurement: Should be presented as the International System of Units (SI).

OBS: Os autores que incluírem figuras, tabelas ou textos que já tenham sido publicados, terão que obrigatoriamente citar a fonte e o ano dos mesmos. Todo o material sem essa citação será assumido como sendo dos autores.

NOTE: Authors who include figures, tables or texts that have already been published, will have to cite the source and year of them. All material without this quotation will be assumed to belong to the authors.


One author: Gottlieb (1996) or (Gottlieb, 1996)

Two authors: Stell & Torres (1989) or (Stell & Torres, 1989)

More than two authors: Valle et al. (1998) or (Valle et al., 1998)


Scientific articles, published in journals, must be at least 90% of all references cited in the submitted manuscript. Scientific references with more than 10 (ten) years of publication should be avoided. If it is necessary to cite these references, the maximum limit allowed is 30% of all citations of the article.

Although not recommended, citation of theses and dissertations is allowed, but in the maximum limit of 10% of all citations of the article.

The references must be presented in alphabetical order.

For references with more than 6 authors presented the names of the 6 first authors followed of the expression et al. Ex: Mattos ADM, Jacovine LAG, Valverde SR, Agostinho LS, Silva ML, Lima, JE et al.

The examples are described below:

Books and pamphlets

Harborne JB. Introduction to ecological biochemistry. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 1988.

Book chapter

Kuiters AT, van Beckhoven K, Ernst WHO. Chemical influences of tree litters on herbaceous vegetation. In: Fanta J, editor. Forest dynamics research in Western and Central Europe. Wageningen: Pudoc; 1986.

Published articles in scientific journals

Latorraca JVF, Albuquerque CEC. Efeito do rápido crescimento sobre as propriedades da madeira. Floresta e Ambiente 2000; 7(1):279-291.

Accepted articles for publication

Almeida MV. Qualidade da madeira de E. urophylla da região de Seropédica – RJ. Floresta e Ambiente. In press.

Santana R. Effect of the fost growth on the wood. Floresta e Ambiente. In press.

Legislative References

Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. Portaria n. 187, de 16 de setembro de 1998. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF (1998 set. 24); Sec. 2: 8301-8302.

Eletronic files

Bellato MA, Fontana DC. El niño e a agricultura da região Sul do Brasil. [cited 2001 abr. 6]. Available from: http://www.cntp.embrapa.br/agromet/elnino2.

Technical Standards

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR-6023: informação e documentação – referências – elaboração. Rio de Janeiro; 2000.


Nogueira MM. Branqueamento de celulose kraft através de oxigênio. BR. n. MT023467. 1978 maio 31.

Casa Erlan Ltda, Silva MA. Embalagens especiais. BR n. DT456345. 1990 out. 12.


Willeitner H. Proteção florestal. Trad. M Peixoto. São Paulo: Nova; 1985. Original em inglês.

Dissertation and thesis

Paiva SR. Aspectos da biologia celular e molecular de espécies de Plumbaginaceae [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 1999.

Brito EO. Produção de chapas de partículas de madeira a partir de maravalhas de Pinus elliottii Engelm. Var. Elliottii plantado no sul do Brasil [tese]. Curitiba: Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Paraná; 1995.


Submission of Manuscripts

Submission of the articles should be done exclusively through the submission system (ScholarOne), available at www.floram.org or www.scielo.br/floram or directly through the link https://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/floram-scielo.

After the "login" in the ScholarOne system, the authors must access the "Author" tab. The submission system will guide the author, step by step, during all stages of submission. The submitting author must necessarily have an Orcid ID properly linked to his ScholarOne account. For more details, click here.

After the submission is completed, the manuscript will receive an identifier number (ID) (eg FLORAM-2018-0001). For submitting revised articles, the ID will provide additional information about the evaluation phase the article is in (eg FLORAM-2018-0001.R1). It is essential that the authors inform the ID of the manuscripts in the contacts and consultations with FLORAM.

During submission, the information entered will be saved even if the submission has not been completed. Manuscripts whose submissions have been initiated, but not completed, present the word “draft” in their ID. This indicates that the manuscript is in draft format and has not yet been submitted for evaluation.

Upload and File Designation

During the submission, the authors should upload the files that are necessary for the evaluation of the work. All uploaded files should receive the correct designation.

The manuscript, already containing all the figures and tables, should be designated as "Main Document". This must be sent in a single file.

Authors may submit supplementary files for the consideration of Editors and Reviewers, such as the database used in the paper. These files should be designated as "Supplemental files for review". All files designated in this way must be free from any information that could compromise the double blind system.

Supplemental files intended exclusively for Publishers should be designated as "Supplemental files not for review". Here, they include: the declaration of revision / translation (see item Language); the letter informing the relationship of the manuscript with academic thesis (see section Binding) and any and all information relevant to the evaluation of the manuscript that has compromising content to the double-blind system.

Evaluation of submission rules

All submitted articles are initially evaluated by the Editorial Secretary regarding compliance with the standards. If an article is disapproved in this evaluation, it will be returned to the authors, being in draft format (See item "Submission of Manuscripts"). The corresponding author will receive an e-mail informing the occurrence, along with the list of verified nonconformities. The author should access the system, adjust the manuscript, and again complete the submission.

Upon the third disapproval in the evaluation of standards, the manuscript will be rejected. Under these conditions, authors may initiate a new submission, generating a new ID.

Transparency and Tracking of the Status of the Manuscript

The evaluation of manuscripts involves several phases. Authors can follow the status of manuscripts directly through the ScholarOne system, in the "Author" tab, in "Submitted Manuscripts". The different status of the manuscripts, following the order of the evaluation process, are:

Awaiting Admin Processing: indicates that the article waits for the evaluation of rules (see item "Evaluation of Submission Rules") by the Editorial Secretary.

Awaiting AE Assignment: The article was approved in the previous step and awaits the appointment of an Associate Editor (AE) by the Chief Editor.

Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The article has already been forwarded to the Associate Editor and awaits the choice of reviewers for it.

Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At this stage, the Associate Editor should invite reviewers to evaluate the article, from those chosen in the previous step.

Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Indicates that invitations have already been sent to reviewers but that reviewers have not yet responded. If there is a refusal on the invitations, the evaluation may return to the Awaiting Reviewer Selection step.

Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Indicates that reviewers who have accepted the invitations have not yet submitted their recommendations.

Awaiting AE Recommendation: The article received the amount of review desired by the Associate Editor. In order to proceed with the evaluation, the Associate Editor should make his recommendation and send the article to the Editor in Chief.

Awaiting EIC Decision: implies that the final decision of the Chief Editor has not yet been issued. This status is shown for all articles that have not yet received the final decision, regardless of the evaluation phase.

Publication of Manuscripts

In the act of accepting the article, the corresponding author will receive an informative email. The accepted paper will be published in the Electronic version (ISSN: 2179-8087).

All accepted papers will only be sent for publication after all involved authors have associated their respective Orcids IDs to their accounts in the ScholarOne system. It is recommended that the association of the Orcid ID be done by the user through the ScholarOne system. For more details, click here.

Accepted Manuscript Processing Fee

FLORAM is an Open Access Journal and all articles submitted are evaluated at no cost. In order for the accepted article to be published, authors must contract the publishing services directly with the accredited company (s) that perform the review, layout and publication of the article according to the editorial standard adopted by FLORAM and accepted by its indexers. The details will be informed along with the letter of acceptance of the article. Payment should only be made directly to the company providing the services. FLORAM does not collect fees. Such a fee costs around $ 200 (two hundred American dollars.). To check the value of the fee contact: artigoprocessfloram@gmail.com


Share this page
Page Sections