Initial Growth of Pinus taeda by Fertilization Response at Planting
Paulo André Trazzi; Juscelina Arcanjo dos Santos; Marcos Vinicius Winckler Caldeira; Diego Fernando Roters; Dulcineia Carvalho; Mário Dobner Júnior
Albaugh T, Stape J, Fox T, Rubilar R, Allen H. Midrotation vegetation control and fertilization response in
Albaugh TJ, Fox TR, Rubilar RA, Cook RL, Amateis RL, Burkhart HE. Post-thinning density and fertilization affect
Alvarado A. Plant nutrition in tropical forestry. In: Pancel L, Köhl M, editors.
Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil.
Alzate MVR, Rubilar RA, Montes C, Allen HL, Fox TR, Sanfuentes E. Mid-rotation response to fertilizer by
Barrow NJ, Debnath A. Effect of phosphate status on the sorption and desorption properties of some soils of northern India.
Bartkowiak SM, Samuelson LJ, McGuire MA, Teskey RO. Fertilization increases sensitivity of canopy stomatal conductance and transpiration to throughfall reduction in an 8-year-old loblolly pine plantation.
Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ. NH4 toxicity in higher plants: a critical review.
Campoe OC, Stape JL, Albaugh TJ, Lee Allen H, Fox TR, Rubilar R et al. Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation.
Carlson CA, Burkhart HE, Allen HL, Fox TR. Absolute and relative changes in tree growth rates and changes to the stand diameter distribution of
Dedecek RA, Fier ISN, Speltz R, Lima LCS. Influência do sítio no desenvolvimento do
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina – EPAGRI.
Everett CJ, Palm-Leis H. Availability of residual phosphorus fertilizer for loblolly pine.
Fife DN, Nambiar EKS. Changes in the canopy and growth of
Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL.
Fox TR, Allen HL, Albaugh TJ, Rubilar RA, Carlson CA. Tree nutrition and forest fertilization of pine plantations in the southern United States.
Grossnickle SC. Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes.
Hinsinger P, Brauman A, Devau N, Gérard F, Jourdan J, Laclau JP et al. Acquisition of phosphorus and other poorly mobile nutrients by roots. Where do plant nutrition models fail?
Hunter I, Graham J, Prince J, Nicholson G. What site factors determine the 4-year basal area response of
Indústria Brasileira de Árvores – IBA.
Maggard A, Will RE, Wilson DS, Meek CR, Vogel JG. Fertilization can compensate for decreased water availability by increasing the efficiency of stem volume production per unit of leaf area for loblolly pine (
Silva PHM, Poggiani F, Libardi PL, Gonçalves AN. Fertilizer management of eucalypt plantations on sandy soil in Brazil: initial growth and nutrient cycling.
Souza VFC, Bertol I, Wolschick NH. Effects of soil management practices on water erosion under natural rainfall conditions on a Humic Dystrudept.
Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS. Old-growth characteristics 20 years after thinning and repeated fertilization of lodgepole pine forest: tree growth, structural attributes, and red-backed voles.
Tiarks AE, Haywood JD.
Vadeboncoeur MA. Meta-analysis of fertilization experiments indicates multiple limiting nutrients in northeastern deciduous forests.
Vallet P, Dhote JF, Moguedec GL, Ravart M, Pignard G. Development of total aboveground volume equations for seven important forest tree species in France.
Vose J, Allen H. Leaf area, stemwood growth, and nutrition relationships in loblolly pine.
Wei L, Marshall JD, Zhang JW, Zhou H, Powers RF. 3-PG simulations of young ponderosa pine plantations under varied management intensity: why do they grow so differently?
Zhao D, Kane MB, Teskey RO, Fox TR, Albaugh TJ, Allen HL et al. Maximum response of loblolly pine plantations to silvicultural management in the southern United States.